From: | Steve Hayes |
---|---|
To: | Curtis Johnson |
Date: | Sep 27 1997 4:52:31 pm |
Subject: |
Festivals Parent message · Link to this message · Link to this thread · More messages from this author · Toggle pseudo-headers |
EID: | 94a8 233b8680 |
MSGID: | 5:7107/9.0 342dfe4f |
REPLY: | 1:261/1000.0 342abd27 |
PID: | BWRA 3.20 [Reg] |
TID: | GE 1.11+ |
Steve Hayes is replying to Curtis Johnson, who wrote to Steve Hayes on 24 Sep 97 22:45:00: CJ> If Easter was supposed to celebrate a historical event, CJ> why is it not celebrated on the date of that event? Because those who celebrate it regard it as a superhistorical event. If you are interested, have a read on what the Venerable Bede had to say about it, and he got pretty verbose about it, because it was a big deal at his time and there were disputes about it. I have not studied it in great detail myself, because my Latin is rusty. I'm not suggesting that you study it in great deal either, unless you are really interested in that question. But if you read what he had to say about it, you do get a picture of why he thought the method of calculating the date was important. And it's also worth thinking about the arguments he *doesn't* use, or the ones that weigh less heavily with him. Keep well, Steve Hayes E-mail: steveh@khanya.bbs.co.za WWW: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734 SEEN-BY: 12/12 112/4 218/890 1001 270/101 353/250 396/1 3615/50 51 PATH: 7107/9 270/101 396/1 3615/50 218/1001