From: | Curtis Johnson |
---|---|
To: | Steve Hayes |
Date: | Oct 2 1997 4:07:32 am |
Subject: |
Festivals Parent message · Link to this message · Link to this thread · More messages from this author · Toggle pseudo-headers |
EID: | c7ab 234220e0 |
PID: | BWMAX2 3.20 [Reg] |
MSGID: | 1:261/1000.0 34343614 |
REPLY: | 5:7107/9.0 3432b39c |
-=> Quoting Steve Hayes to Curtis Johnson <=- CJ> Conybeare says nothing about the Saturnalia angle, but the CJ> Mithraic angle looks solid. SH> Thanks very much for posting it. Saved for future reference. SH> I had not come across the infant baptism angle before, and found it SH> somewhat contrived. Also the absence of any reference to the Arian SH> controversy, which occupied the minds of Christians in the second and SH> third quarters of the 4th century, and which seems to me a far more SH> likely reason for Christians to begin celebrating the birth of Christ. I hadn't seen the infant baptism notion either; I suspect it may be original with Conybeare. It is interesting; and Conybeare was a scholar on early Christian origins who still gets cited. My reaction is to suspend judgment on that particular angle. There's no reaction to Arianism that I can imagine offhand in the celebration of Christmas. The Arians were Arians, after all, because they denied a divinity to Christ, whereas a celebration of the birth could only underscore his humanity. The denial of divinity to Jesus seems to have been a theological position taken by at least some from the first. It would be interesting to see if there were a correlation between the growth of the Mary cultus and a holiday which only served to increase her status. Of course, here there might be a chicken-and-egg question--and a probable influence from another mystery cult, that of Isis, whose art had an Isis-holding-the-baby -Horus motif. (Note also that the women of Mithraists gravitated largely toward the Isis mystery religion.) SH> The reference to Britain seemed a bit odd. The English had not begun SH> arriving in Britain in significant numbers before the 5th century, SH> and, as is well-known, Christians began celebrating the birth of SH> Christ (as a separate event from his baptism) some time in the second SH> quarter of the 4th century. I don't believe Conybeare was contending a direct influence from the British holiday. Since the Enc. Brit. really was British in this edition, he had to say something British before he ran out of space. (Notice the one small paragraph devoted to modern and world customs.) That holiday was likely was a solstice celebration if it was entirely native in origin (whether Anglo-Saxon or the earlier populace). It is worth noting, and wondering if it is mere coincidence, that Britain was one of the strongholds of Mithraism. (And Constantine the Great and his father were Roman soldiers stationed in Britain.) SEEN-BY: 12/12 112/4 218/890 1001 270/101 353/250 396/1 3615/50 51 PATH: 261/1000 1137 270/101 396/1 3615/50 218/1001