From: | Curtis Johnson |
---|---|
To: | Steve Hayes |
Date: | Sep 28 1997 5:38:22 am |
Subject: |
Festivals Parent message · Link to this message · Link to this thread · More messages from this author · Toggle pseudo-headers |
EID: | c7ab 233c2cc0 |
PID: | BWMAX2 3.20 [Reg] |
MSGID: | 1:261/1000.0 342ed419 |
REPLY: | 5:7107/9.0 342dfe4e |
-=> Quoting Steve Hayes to Curtis Johnson <=- SH> not found any of the secondary sources that make such assertions SH> pointing to a primary source that backs them up. CJ> The dots are not all that hard to connect. SH> No, they are not. SH> But if you connect them a different way, you get a different picture. SH> And the kind of picture people get from connecting the dots usually SH> owes a lot to their own presuppositions and frame of reference. If one changed only the names, this would clear away such presuppositions and frame of reference. I submit that the result would then be "Of course; isn't it obvious?" Of course, this would do nothing for the presuppostion that "My religion has to be unique in each and every way, because --because it's *my* religion." I trust this is not true for you. Add to my previous "dots" that the Saturnalia was celebrated on intercalary days, and that the twelve days from Dec. 25 to Jan. 6 (the latter was also regarded as a nativity date) match the intercalary dates that have to be inserted when a lunar calendar is used. Also, "the world-turned-upside-down" celebrating is typical world-wide of intercalary days, and this was exactly the time of that great medieval institution, the Feast of Fools. My finger's well enough now for me to keyboard that entry I promised you. Look for it in this packet. Sadly, Conybeare says nothing about the Saturnalia angle, but the Mithraic angle looks solid. SEEN-BY: 12/12 112/4 218/890 1001 270/101 353/250 396/1 3615/50 51 PATH: 261/1000 1137 270/101 396/1 3615/50 218/1001