From: Paul Masson
To: Laurie Appleton
Date: Oct 29 1998 11:53:10 pm
Subject: What If?
Parent message · Link to this message · Link to this thread ·
More messages from this author · Toggle pseudo-headers
-> On 28 Oct 98  13:11:24, Laurie Appleton got back to Paul Masson

LA> 1. Sudden Appearance.
LA> 2. Stasis.
LA> 3. Catastrophism.

PM> That is evolution, Laurie.

LA> No kidding? Isn't Stasis the opposite to constant
LA> ceaseless change?

PM>     No, Laurie.  It is the interim period where there is
PM> no evolutionary pressures causing an abundances of very
PM> noticable changes.

LA> Then it is obvious that the old evolutionary hypothesis
LA> that was taught for at least 120 years, was just a load of
LA> rubbish eh?

You do like to erect strawmen at every turn, do you not.  No one
here other than you is claiming that the original theory as
proposed by Darwin has never been corrected.  However, Laurie,
the basic premise of that theory is that evolution not only
occurred but is occurring today.

LA> (Newsweek, 3/11/80, p. 54)

More out of context quotes to bolster your canards?

Give yourself a rest, Laurie.  The ICR surely has operatives out
searching for you to silence you.

... 3rd Rule of Creationism: Don't appear to use creationist sources.
--- OMX/Blue Wave v2.12
* Origin: Soundly on the Fault Line (1:123/67.5)
SEEN-BY: 12/12 24/888 102/749 943 103/903 105/72 106/1 2000 107/451 114/441
SEEN-BY: 124/1 7008 128/139 149 130/1 133/2 138/2 140/1 143/1 147/2021
SEEN-BY: 167/166 170/400 218/890 1001 250/99 251/25 267/200 270/101 1000
SEEN-BY: 271/140 275/1 280/1 282/1031 300/603 310/666 321/159 323/107
SEEN-BY: 371/42 377/97 382/92 384/14 387/5 388/1 396/1 45 606/1 633/260
SEEN-BY: 730/2 80 805/4 2004/201 2215/180 2401/0 2442/2000 2501/209 3603/140
SEEN-BY: 3615/50 51 3639/90 3651/9 3804/180 5100/8
PATH: 123/67 54 270/101 396/1 3615/50 218/1001 890