Messages Dated December 2000
1 - 20 of 1,926

Re: Here we go again...
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Robert Sayre You may, of course, do so but it is merely an indication of your lack of integrity, honesty and logic when you so do. If you can live with the shame, go for it. Irrelevant. Believe in one hand and shit in the other, see which fills up first. Now, if you had a wee bit of evidence, you

Re: HOLYSMOKE-LIST Digest
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: God Dan Waste of time he can't think well enough to understand the burden of proof and that his "though true" statement is sufficient to debunk him.

Re: Why me, lord?
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Don Martin I believe it was Sagan who noted something like the following: "They laughed at Einstein, too!" "Yes, and they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." In Holysmoke, where reason fails, derision is sure to follow. Perhaps we should call this "Don's Law."

Re: fuck the fiddler
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Robert Sayre Oh, my, we didn't see that one coming (yawn). I now officially label you a liar and dismiss you, Rob. An honest man would have said "I have no evidence that would withstand critical scrutiny, but I believe anyway as a matter of faith." A dishonest man, like yourself, instead attempts to blame others for not accepting, sight unseen, evidence

Re: Butterflies
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Ed Mills Would you please speak to your political sleazebag friends about wearing condoms when they fuck the chads, then, Ed? Thanks.

Re: Making sense
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Steve Quarrella It depends. Are we talking kosher unicorns?

"piss here"
Interveiw with Charlie Darwin 2nd Installment by Dale F. Beaudoin Q. So you suggest that perhaps it is possible that plants are the fittest of all living things in nature? A. I will only state this hypothetically and not "for the record" but, while during my studies I had noticed that some plants developed a "piss here" sort of beckoning process. Some flowers have different scents. Scents that almost act as imediate diruetics. Man, in his shame always has

Re: Biblical contradictions
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Blanche Nonken <momblanche@bigfoot.com> X-Ftn-To: WAYNE CHIRNSIDE Hey, Wayne? Have you thought about the possibility of getting financing and buying the place yourself? I know being on disability and all is a drawback, but it might be a half-decent income generating investment; and then *you* get to decide who lives there. I doubt you could get a loan through a conventional bank, but if your credit rating's

Crackpots
Ross, this is the 3rd message I've seen with this at the end. No extension messages have been received here. Thought you'd want to know........ slack s.

Anybody notice this?
DAMN RIGHT!! This is the basis of ALL civilized discussion, Robert!! We want our terms DEFINED so we can know whether or not something exists! Like most God-beLIEvers, you want everything to forever remain in your dark, ill-focused world of "possibilities", where terms have no fixed definitions and anything can mean whatever the God-beLIEvers need it to mean. ROTFLMAO!! Falsifiable evidence, you mean?? That's all I see Joseph asking you for above. "Resuscible" and "genuinely dead" are mutually incompatible terms,

Biblical contradictions
Courtesy of one Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the law which ended the Burning Times and saved North America from becoming like the Middle East. At ANY TIME one co-mingles the State power with Abrahamic religion, tyranny and oppression are the inevitable results. slack s.

Re: Anybody notice this?
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Blanche Nonken <momblanche@bigfoot.com> X-Ftn-To: Ross Sauer Nahum doesn't use the KJV. He lives in Israel, Hebrew is his spoken tongue, and presumeably he reads the Bible in an untranslated version.

Anybody notice this?
Alright then, evidence. I looked on the web and no place can I find spontanious generation. Quantum physics doesn't have this, as far as I've been able to determine. What I DO find is that no theory is complete enough to stand alone; none can account for all known phenomina. Some do not allow for gravity, for example. Superstring theory is expected to help bring us to a more complete understanding, but is still in its infancy. Please give me

Re: Unsupportable personal incredulity
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Steve Quarrella Personally, I have no beliefs on the subject not even a belief that the universe "came from" anywhere at all. After all, the universe may be considered as a unique object, finite in space and time, which merely exists. If one wishes to speculate on origins, one can certainly do so, talking about things like inflation fields and cosmic

Re: Jim Steinman
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> X-Ftn-To: Karl Schneider "Paradise by the Dashboard Light." Great song. Jim Steinman, who wrote it and many other Loaf songs, is formulaic, but it's a pretty good formula when he gets it just right and has someone with a good voice to perform.

Anybody notice this?
You made the statement that supernatural things are incapable of interaction with nature. Making a second statement that there is zero evidence for any gods is not evidence of any kind, let alone evidence to support your first claim. Robert

Re: HOLYSMOKE-LIST Digest
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109 From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com> What utter rubbish: 1. Attempt to shift the burden of proof. It is not up to us to state that "there is no God," it is up to those who claim there is one to evidence the claim. They never seem to be able to do it (though they have plenty of nice dance routines to show us in its stead). I wonder

Anybody notice this? 1/2
This material is Copyright c 1995 1997 by the Center for Scientific Creation. All rights reserved. This is the online edition of Part III: Frequently Asked Questions from In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown. A hard copy can be ordered online here. Is the Hydroplate Theory Consistent with the Bible? ...some details of the flood can be pieced together by studying its wreckage. Nevertheless, witnesses provide details that are consistent with

Anybody notice this? 2/2
covering the earth (Genesis 1:2). About half the earth's water was above this crust and half below. On the third day, this crust was brought up out of the water causing the water above the crust to gather gravitationally in one place (Genesis 1:9). In other words, the earth (its crust) was formed out of (lifted out of) water. Centuries later, the water which remained below the crust burst forth and flooded the earth. The same Hebrew word, baqa, is

Anybody notice this?
They don't come from nothing, they require energy. They are considered to be like particles of matter just after the Big Bang. Robert