Messages Dated December 2000
1 - 20 of 1,926
Re: Here we go again...
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Robert Sayre
You may, of course, do so but it is merely an indication of your lack
of
integrity, honesty and logic when you so do. If you can live with the
shame, go for it.
Irrelevant. Believe in one hand and shit in the other, see which fills
up
first. Now, if you had a wee bit of evidence, you
Re: HOLYSMOKE-LIST Digest
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: God Dan
Waste of time he can't think well enough to understand the burden of
proof and that his "though true" statement is sufficient to debunk him.
Re: Why me, lord?
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Don Martin
I believe it was Sagan who noted something like the following:
"They laughed at Einstein, too!"
"Yes, and they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."
In Holysmoke, where reason fails, derision is sure to follow. Perhaps we
should call this "Don's Law."
Re: fuck the fiddler
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Robert Sayre
Oh, my, we didn't see that one coming (yawn).
I now officially label you a liar and dismiss you, Rob. An honest man would
have said "I have no evidence that would withstand critical scrutiny, but
I
believe anyway as a matter of faith." A dishonest man, like yourself,
instead attempts to blame others for not accepting, sight unseen, evidence
Re: Butterflies
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Ed Mills
Would you please speak to your political sleazebag friends about wearing
condoms when they fuck the chads, then, Ed? Thanks.
Re: Making sense
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Steve Quarrella
It depends. Are we talking kosher unicorns?
"piss here"
Interveiw with Charlie Darwin
2nd Installment
by Dale F. Beaudoin
Q. So you suggest that perhaps it is possible that plants are the
fittest of all living things in nature?
A. I will only state this hypothetically and not "for the record" but,
while during my studies I had noticed that some plants developed
a "piss here" sort of beckoning process. Some flowers have different
scents. Scents that almost act as imediate diruetics. Man, in his
shame always has
Re: Biblical contradictions
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Blanche Nonken <momblanche@bigfoot.com>
X-Ftn-To: WAYNE CHIRNSIDE
Hey, Wayne? Have you thought about the possibility of getting financing
and buying the place yourself? I know being on disability and all is a
drawback, but it might be a half-decent income generating investment;
and then *you* get to decide who lives there. I doubt you could get a
loan through a conventional bank, but if your credit rating's
Crackpots
Ross, this is the 3rd message I've seen with this at the end. No extension
messages have been received here.
Thought you'd want to know........
slack s.
Anybody notice this?
DAMN RIGHT!!
This is the basis of ALL civilized discussion, Robert!!
We want our terms DEFINED so we can know whether or not something exists!
Like most God-beLIEvers, you want everything to forever remain in your dark,
ill-focused world of "possibilities", where terms have no fixed definitions
and anything can mean whatever the God-beLIEvers need it to mean.
ROTFLMAO!!
Falsifiable evidence, you mean??
That's all I see Joseph asking you for above.
"Resuscible" and "genuinely dead" are mutually incompatible terms,
Biblical contradictions
Courtesy of one Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the law which ended the Burning
Times and saved North America from becoming like the Middle East.
At ANY TIME one co-mingles the State power with Abrahamic religion, tyranny
and oppression are the inevitable results.
slack s.
Re: Anybody notice this?
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Blanche Nonken <momblanche@bigfoot.com>
X-Ftn-To: Ross Sauer
Nahum doesn't use the KJV. He lives in Israel, Hebrew is his spoken
tongue, and presumeably he reads the Bible in an untranslated version.
Anybody notice this?
Alright then, evidence.
I looked on the web and no place can I find
spontanious generation. Quantum physics doesn't
have this, as far as I've been able to determine.
What I DO find is that no theory is complete enough
to stand alone; none can account for all known
phenomina. Some do not allow for gravity, for example.
Superstring theory is expected to help bring us to a
more complete understanding, but is still in its
infancy.
Please give me
Re: Unsupportable personal incredulity
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Steve Quarrella
Personally, I have no beliefs on the subject not even a belief that the
universe "came from" anywhere at all. After all, the universe may be
considered as a unique object, finite in space and time, which merely
exists. If one wishes to speculate on origins, one can certainly do so,
talking about things like inflation fields and cosmic
Re: Jim Steinman
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
X-Ftn-To: Karl Schneider
"Paradise by the Dashboard Light." Great song. Jim Steinman, who wrote
it
and many other Loaf songs, is formulaic, but it's a pretty good formula
when
he gets it just right and has someone with a good voice to perform.
Anybody notice this?
You made the statement that supernatural things
are incapable of interaction with nature.
Making a second statement that there is zero
evidence for any gods is not evidence of any
kind, let alone evidence to support your first
claim.
Robert
Re: HOLYSMOKE-LIST Digest
REPLYTO 1:102/125.99 UUCP
REPLYADDR HOLYSMOKE-LIST@salata.com
GID GIGO+ sn 148 at salata vsn 0.99.970109
From: Mark Kimes <hectorp@softdisk.com>
What utter rubbish:
1. Attempt to shift the burden of proof. It is not up to us to state that
"there is no God," it is up to those who claim there is one to evidence
the
claim. They never seem to be able to do it (though they have plenty of
nice
dance routines to show us in its stead). I wonder
Anybody notice this? 1/2
This material is Copyright c 1995 1997 by the Center for Scientific
Creation. All rights reserved. This is the online edition of Part III:
Frequently Asked Questions from In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence
for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown. A hard copy can be ordered
online here.
Is the Hydroplate Theory Consistent with the Bible?
...some details of the flood can be pieced together by studying its
wreckage. Nevertheless, witnesses provide details that are consistent
with
Anybody notice this? 2/2
covering the earth (Genesis 1:2). About half the earth's water was
above this crust and half below. On the third day, this crust was
brought up out of the water causing the water above the crust to
gather gravitationally in one place (Genesis 1:9). In other words,
the earth (its crust) was formed out of (lifted out of) water.
Centuries later, the water which remained below the crust burst forth
and flooded the earth. The same Hebrew word, baqa, is
Anybody notice this?
They don't come from nothing, they require energy.
They are considered to be like particles of matter
just after the Big Bang.
Robert