Messages Dated April 1998
101 - 120 of 5,572
Hector's Law hits again!
Now just watch. Jimson will prove the corollary as well Helping \/tian
To Stop /\tortion Richard Smith
English Major
I bet most of us just wished that he'd learn ONE language Helping \/tian
To Stop /\tortion Richard Smith
Go Reggie
Psst to Karl: If you pander to Jism, you know what that
makes you, right? <g,d,rlbh>
Helping \/tian
To Stop /\tortion Richard Smith
Ooh, changing the subject line, how banal.
'ullo Curtis,
On 27 Mar 98 you were yakking on about Ooh, changing the subject line, how
banal. weren't ya?
LOL! Can't wait for Jimbozo to get hold of that one!
Hehe...I don't think the missus would like that! regards,
jAMBO! /dESiDONiAN/
Blue Genes.
Whichever way you use the terms it is (by and large) considered offensive
by
the people (or person) you are referring to.
regards,
jAMBO! /dESiDONiAN/
Dr Quack [2]
'ullo Jim,
On 29 Mar 98 you were yakking on about Dr Quack
[2] weren't ya?
Thankyou. The problem is the lack of evidence of ANY sort. You have not submitted
any
evidence for the so-called skeptics to disprove.
regards,
jAMBO! /dESiDONiAN/
Evidence
When? In the bible? "This is the word of the lord?" The "lord" could be
a
lying, scheming git.
How so?
regards,
jAMBO! /dESiDONiAN/
?
The Mormon equivalent of the end of "Monty Python and the Holy Grail."
Blue Genes.
OK, I got you. Thanks for the explanation. How'd he get "IUsers" out of
it, though? Is that like Fred Rice and his "iJBS" or "iJCJ?"
Where I come from, they are known as "VTs" "Viable Targets."
Dr Quack
Ford's knack for golf.
Dr Quack
I had this conversation with him years ago. I -think- I may have attempted
to explain the term "recursion" at the time. His response was, then, and
will be, now, "Because the Bible says so." Of course, the Book of Mormon
"says so," too, but for some odd reason, Fundamentalists become scientific
when dealing with the Book of Mormon. They don't apply their same analytical
standards to the Christian Bible, though. <scratching head>
Heathen Randi rant
That's one on which I'm working right now, sorting out "Messages to Save"
and "Messages Which Need Responses."
I'm wondering when I'm going to have to do battle with the people who want
an Echo Policy.
Jack the Ripper
How's the guy who pulled the Ripper diary hoax doing?
snappy
He can suck my Yellow Submarine if he doesn't like it here.
--Steve Quarrella, moderator
THE ONE TRUE WORD. ALL OF
"Hell" is the operative word. My last two years of high school English
were spent working with literature, and grammar was minimal. My tenth grade
teacher was probably a dominatrix bitch from Hell when she was younger,
and I usually dealt with her bullshit by having a few beers before going
into her class at 8:30 AM (I could NOT do that now if I tried). She was
really something else, and I did my best not to pay attention
Jimbozo
How about the Word '97 Easter Egg, in which you put in "Zzzz", run the spell-checker,
and get 'sex' as a suggested replacement.
Case #3
Although they did try it out in reverse gear once.
Atheistic Knowledge
Sorry. All I have is real money. I don't light cigars with that.
PHIL
Andy Cummins? that pointy headed little creationist. Tell him we're goiving
away BMW's.
Re: Scar Tissue
RFC-Message-ID: <010419982110574John.Musselwhite@newn.com>
RFC-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2ts5ip36.cadvision.com
RFC-X-Comment-From: JOHN MUSSELWHITE
From: JOHN MUSSELWHITE<musselj@cadvision.com>
Hi Ross...
On 03-30-98 03:45, Ross Sauer penned the following to Charles Veitengruber
re: Re: Scar Tissue
The point may be moot in the near future, Ross. A couple of
weeks ago geneticists reported that they have identified a gene
(or genes) that may be responsible for contributing to "chronic
pain". Research on the discovery is underway right now and the
news reports I heard indicated an effective gene therapy