Messages Dated March 1998
9,221 - 9,228 of 9,228
Re: Burden
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: jjhitt@swbell.net (J.J. Hitt)
Subject: Re: Burden
Organization: Self
X-Ftn-To: DAVID WORRELL
It's Curtis. What do you expect?
Who else would try and tell me things about a book he's
never seen by making wild assed guesses about it when
I have a personal copy of the book not four feet from where
I sit?
This is also the same user who was convinced that Langston
Goldfinch
Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: jjhitt@swbell.net (J.J. Hitt)
Subject: Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
Organization: Self
X-Ftn-To: mkimes@ibm.net
The CRI in question is the group founded by Walter Martin.
They specialize on "cults" and pointing the finger at
groups they feel are "not Real True Christians".
The name is Christian Research Institute and while I
dont have an address, Martin was out of Annaheim, CA and
I would expect any group
Grades != God
Oh, of course not! It's just that the foreign accent is a lot
more stylish on the boardwalk.
"And here we have Mssr. Jacques modeling his new GUT. Isn't it
lovely, Marge?"
"Oh yes, they've definitely outdone themselves with this year's
theories."
Just watch out for the pararaparparaprap... photographers.
Burden
Well, yeah, but that doesn't help me a lot when I have someone
telling me "But this and that and the other so it's a lot of
hogwash". I was kinda hoping you (or someone) could gimmie a
quick primer so I could, in turn, explain it to others.
THE ONE TRUE WORD. ALL OF
It gave me fits in high school, and it took me some time to understand it
(I was slow as far as English grammar was concerned, as my English grammar
teachers tended to make things difficult.). I had a girlfriend who was
rather anal about my use of "who" rather than "whom," and over time, proper
use of "whom" entered my vocabulary (undergrad level of college), but it
wasn't until I had a look at Old English that I actually
Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: momblanche@bigfoot.com (Blanche Nonken)
Subject: Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
X-Ftn-To: jjhitt@swbell.net (J.J. Hitt)
You're right. That was just my knee jerking into my face. Call
it a Bad Day reaction.
Blanche Nonken http://www.bigfoot.com/~momblanche
Any opinions expressed herein are my own, unless I borrowed them.
Unsolicited commercial email will be ignored, tossed, and/or
complained about and I won't buy anything from you. Gated
Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: Chuck Slotter's Idiot Cl
jjhitt@swbell.net (J.J. Hitt) said:
Isn't it possible that people mean to refer to the latter, not the former?
I certainly seem to see them saying _Creation_ Research Institute, not
_Christian_ Research Institute.
I did notice a lot of Christian pages on the web pointing to the latter
while labelling it the former, though. Hec Gated by
Moral 2
It guess you could call it a wildcat well.
I said sort of the same thing and haven't gotten a single response to it.
Here, take this quarter!