Messages Dated January 1998
1 - 20 of 7,140
Your moderation of UFO
Yes, that is the way I took it, and your misinterpretation of the
following is further proof.
No, David >claimed< he had not yet read his incoming netmail. The
point is, he was asked repeatedly to move the discussion to netmail,
and he refused to do so for several days, before finally giving up
the ghost.
You call me a liar when the proof is staring you in the face?
His exact words are printed above... Both his language and
Left-Handedness
Deer?
Atleast reindeer are notoriously stupid, and will happily wait until
getting _bumped_, to move out of the way.
/%/)+Eddy
Spelling
Let me get this straight you implied in an earlier
message to me that it was what was said that was at the root
of an argument, now how it was presented clearly
implying that one should be able to overlook spelling,
grammatical, etc., errors. In other words, the medium is
NOT the message. (You were, at that point, conveniently
ignoring the fact that the medium became the message in that
particular case because
sin and failure
Perhaps you meant Galileo? <g>
Tag-X Pro v1.60: 01/01/98 at 04:13:08
Faulty genes
Ok, let's assume that God created two people (Adam and Eve) from which all
humanity is descended. For these subsequent generations to have enjoyed
'safe' breeding, i.e. breeding with no chance of birth defects, they would,
as you rightly point out, have had to have perfect, fault-free genes.
So where did all these defective, imperfect genes come from?
EEAS
eric@kobayashi.com http://www.kobayashi.com/maru/
MORE CRAPOLA FROM WILLIE
As I said before, I've seen this either on Ripley or <snicker> Unsolved
Mysteries. Whichever, they made a point of stressing that NO scientific
tests have been allowed on this piece of cloth because of it's 'fragility'.
They admit that the conclusions Willie makes are all just what they
'speculate' that scientific investigation would find.
I just did that with my paint program. I have an eye in which, if you
look closely, you can see the image of a
FEEDBACK
or
[snip]
John, I take it from your answer that you don't realize that the topic
of discussion is Chris's condescending refusal to answer some questions
that Ron Vass put to him?
Even after being told about Ron's problems with communications, Chris's
stock answer was that he was 'tiresome' and not worth even considering.
Oh, brother!
I've never been into conspiracy theorys George. Fred just
goes rather overboard on the line that fundies and various
other loons have severe mental problems in the insanity sense.
I've always thought that by far the most likely explanation for
particularly kids being very interested in ideas like ETs etc is
just that thats much more interesting than the much more mundane
idea that suggestible people see the current folk myth.
Thats the way kids are, and you see it
Dead Strange Universe
Thats the way these 'debate' type echoes work George. You try
to score political points yourself on occasion, and did so below.
Sure, but the fundamentals like that are just the detail
used when attempting some point scoring at times. You could
try bursting into tears in the privacy of your bedroom.
Probably not a triffic idea to do it here tho, you'll
likely get pretty comprehensively savaged if you do And here you are attempting to go for
Re: Jack's "moderation"
Your problem. Reread your messages in this particular thread.
No thanks, you have flaunted the fact that you are completely
hopeless as a moderator, so that would be pointless. Corse you
might conceivably be telling a complete pack of lies about your
moderation, but you dont matter enough to bother checking that.
Pity my list of echoes too badly moderated to bother
with has absolutely NOTHING to do with the SKEPTICS echo.
EOT:
Creationism vs Evolution
yep, and many other infectious diseases that mutate at a high rate
would to. some of those would actually be rather better examples,
just because the bird flu is a bit too new for all the fine detail
to have been fully worked out yet.
HIV is actually rather better, mainly because its been studied much
longer and quite a bit of that has extended to full DNA sequencing thats
allowed quite a bit of the detail of its evolution
Blue Genes.
It is bewildering to notice just how confused so many
evolutionists really are! Maybe this chap is a bit of a
kid, whose parents have just bought him his very first
computer and modem?
Best wishes for 1998. May it be rewarding and fulfilling
for you and yours.
Laurie
Dimensions.
Hi Finn,
(Re: yours of 04-Jan-1992, "Dimensions")
[Seems like David Sparrow must have given you a free Bible
for Christmas eh Finn? You are probably right. And. Laurie
The Judo Argument.
Sort of 'hit and run' eh? In other words you know that it
is all so pitifully weak that you don't want to risk it
being "blown out of the water"! I don't blame you. It is
nonsense from beginning to end and if you believe all that
then Asimov is the same thing as a mystical Indian GURU to
you and you are little more than a faithful unthinking and
unreasoning zombie!
Laurie
Ants & Anteaters!
I doubt if they would have to bother. Why wouldn't
they have fed themselves? After all, as I said, I thought
that Noah's biggest problem might have been in trying to
keep the pesty insects OUT. If anything, I would not blame
Noah of he took a couple of EXTRA anteaters along just to
make sure that there was enough of them to keep those ants
under control!
Laurie
Moon Dust Blunder.
Hi Rena,
(Re: yours of 26-Dec-1997, "Moon Dust Blunder.") Sounds like you are hoping to get a Ph.D. in Astronomy or
Cosmology all in one short message, or you fancy yourself as
already a Professor and you are setting me the questions to
tackle for my Ph.D. Sorry "No Banana".
However, no evolutionist KNOWS how galaxies form and
neither do any of them know how stars form either. I will be
prepared to "Answer
Blue Genes.
Why would God want to do that? Why not make them
different? Surely as the "Ultimate Bioengineer" He could do
that!
Inbreeding can only INCREASE such things if there are
ALREADY faulty genes in one of both of the mating partners!
It was YOU who wanted the term "sons of god" explained
wasn't it? So the Book says that Adam was the son of God and
thus Adams sons (except Cain) would also be sons of God.
No doubt the
Blue Genes (b)
Hi Rena,
(Re: yours of 26-Dec-1997, "Blue Genes.")
My my my. You ARE becoming a big contributor aren't
you:-) It is the evolutionary view that has humans developing
from apes and ignorance. The Creation view is the opposite.
Humans have "fallen" from a high state of knowledge and
understanding.
Modern doctors know that we not only have perhaps 1,500
genetic defects, but that the number of such defects is
increasing!
I suggest that you try to avoid
Giant Tanning Booth.
On the contrary. It is your comment that is trying to do
the side-stepping. You give the impression that you know so
little about this particular subject that it would be hardly
possible to explain it to you anyway! However, Sir Fred
Hoyle gives all the explanation that need concern us here.
He writes;
"In the latter part of the nineteenth century, [that]
Kelvin and Helmholtz independently calculated that
gravitation could provide for the Sun's radiation over
Jack's a specific example
<laughing!> This "radiating unfriendlieness" is a delusional mental
construct _you_ concocted in your own head, Jack. It is an artifact of
years of trying to justify continued belief in soundly debunked notions;
it has become habit to you to contrive notions to escape the truth about
things and when you apply them toward your intellectual superiors, you
find yourself digging yourself deeper trying to defend your dishonesty.
This is an earmark of the contemporary believer these days. From John
Mack