Messages Dated September 1997
1 - 20 of 7,620
Re: 10%
Oh and you are so brilliant that you post this piece of sh*t as a response.
You certainly in no way qualified your statement and therefore it is
worth less than doggie doodoo.
I make the point that just because things might be abnormal or unnatural
does not mean people have a right to stop others from doing them and in
fact in many times society condones and encourages abnormal and unnatural
acts, and instead of commenting on the point,
Re: Potassium/Argon dating
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: Potassium/Argon dating
X-Ftn-To: Rick Mcfarlane
Thanks for answering the question I asked Laurie, when he couldn't do so
himself. But I'll bet he didn't like your answer. Gated by the premier Fido Technology Networks gateway Providing USENET, Internet Email and FTP hub facilities. See <a href="http://ftn.hub.org"></a> for details.
Re: ABORTION
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: ABORTION
X-Ftn-To: Roger Hunter
I remind you, irrelevantly, that no one gets outta here alive. Gated by the premier Fido Technology Networks gateway Providing USENET, Internet Email and FTP hub facilities. See <a href="http://ftn.hub.org"></a> for details.
Re: flying rocks
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: flying rocks
X-Ftn-To: John Brawley
fly v. 3. To move or be sent through the air
with great speed: "bullets flying in
every direction; a plate that flew
from my hands when I stumbled." Gated by the premier Fido Technology Networks gateway Providing USENET, Internet Email and FTP hub facilities. See <a href="http://ftn.hub.org"></a> for details.
Re: Ouija game
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: Ouija game
John.Brawley@p1.f435.n100.z1.gryn.org (John Brawley) said:
game n. 1. An activity providing entertainment or
amusement: "party games; word games." Gated by the premier Fido Technology Networks gateway Providing USENET, Internet Email and FTP hub facilities. See <a href="http://ftn.hub.org"></a> for details.
Re: Quantum Bait Shop
REPLYTO 1:2424/11.1 UUCP
REPLYADDR holysmoke@gryn.org
GID GIGO+ sn 245 at tor250 vsn 0.99.970109
From: mkimes@ibm.net
Subject: Re: Quantum Bait Shop
X-Ftn-To: John Brawley
John, the Copenhagen Interpretation is not "quantum mechanics" any more
than a Jimmy Swaggert sermon is "Christianity." Gated by the premier Fido Technology Networks gateway Providing USENET, Internet Email and FTP hub facilities. See <a href="http://ftn.hub.org"></a> for details.
Star Goat In Review!
Date: 08-28-97 (12:59)
From: FREDRIC RICE
To: MASOCHISTIC MAIDEN
Subj: Star Goat In Review! Thanks Fred. Thats the 1'st time it made it up here.
Nice try
apples oranges.. my question was in the context of explaining that
there are relationships that aren't marriage, that shouldn't get married
status benefits... your rejoinder supports my viewpoint...
Marriage is the civil recognition of the sexual union between unrelated
man and woman in what is supposed to be a lifelong exclusive committed
relationship...
Both points, above, do not fit the model.
To return to the thread's topic... (marriage benefits/rewards from the
State, and who should qualify); my model
Antitrinitianarism
Which only goes to prove that Ken Wiens, whoever he is, is a human
being, prone to error. and you feel this, somehow, reflects upon
universal truths?
the
another pithy explanation is that the trinity is like water(solid(ice),
liquid(water), and gas(vapour)). Proof, please?
Already did, in the post you replied to, but you, like the rest of these
half-baked athiests and pagans in here, conveniently quote to suit your
preset agenda. Your servant,
Why Freud Isn't Dead
The Scientific American article "Why Freud Isn't Dead" can be acquired
from SA through their reprint offices by requesting "Why Freud Isn't
Dead," December 1996. Call (212) 754-0550 or FAX (212) 355-0408.
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <DARWIN><
EAT THEM IN FRONT OF YOUR VICTIMS? David Stoddard
Freud Debunked Again
Rod is an atheist. It's highly unlikely that he would employ or advocate
a tool or method which has been traditionally the venue of theists. No,
I'm sure that Rod would find that whacking you with a seat cushion would
be more to his sexual preference. <grin>
The fact that Freud was not a genius remains, by the way.
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <DARWIN><
labeling people "sinners" Larry Sites
Oh no! Not dred atheists!
<he he> I'm so clever. 'Must be this clean mountain air.
<grin> Yes, I'm sure you do except that one must remember that the
focus of the discussion isn't about you or anyone in this forum it's
about vague, unspecific claims not being supported when politely asked.
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <DARWIN><
useless while denying the fact that living is its own greatest
reward. Fredric Rice (HolySmoke, December 1996)
What an ass
A preacher wanted to earn money for his church, he had heard
there was big money in horse racing so he decided to purchase
a horse and enter him in the races. However at the local
auction the going price for horses was too steep
and the preacher ended up buying a Donkey. The Preacher figured
since he had the Donkey. He might as well enter it in the races.
The next day the donkey came in third. The
Janet Reno and Henry Kissinger Together
It's humorous, yes, and might indicate an interesting phenomena if it
were expressed in a larger percentage of the atheist popoulace. After
some six years or so, I think you're the first atheist to preface a
"rebuttle" with the words, "While I'm an atheist..."
You're unique, Barbara. We must cut you into wafer-thin sections and
slide you under a microscope. <grin>
And yet you continually refuse to back-up your vague accusations with
any specifics. I suppose this is acceptable behavior
The View From Up Here
Ah, good. What will make me happy is when you post references which
refute anything I've posted. I will dump your references to paper and
research them the very next day.
Until then, I'll continue to experience manic depression and down those
lithium tablets every hour on the hour. Since that treatment gets to be
rather expensive, I do hope you'll not take your time.
But I like the view from up here. As Jesus said when he was drying
These Sore Knees
Interestingly enough it's true. While several studies have shown that
thinking at deity constructs improves one's mental disposistion, it has
also shown that it doesn't matter which deity constructs one thinks at.
(Shit. A dangleing participle. Somebody cut it off, 'kay?)
One god is scientifically as good as another.
In real terms of altering physical reality, thinking at deity constructs
was determined scientifically to be the equal to thinking at a table top.
The only constant were the sore knees.
Strip the Vega
It seems certain that the James Randi Foundation turns down claims as
vague and as silly as yours. Indeed, as I recall, they require an
enumerated list of specifics about claimed phenomena before they'll even
begin to evaluate whether it's worth their time and resources.
I can forward a contact address for you if you wish. It wouldn't do
for me to contact them for you I have a respectable image I should
try to maintain. This would
A plagiarize upon you all!
If I plagiarize further it's because I stand upon the shoulders of
those great who came before me. (I'm so fucking clever!)
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <DARWIN><
prattle. Which is it? David Rice
Perhaps he worships Shroedinger's Cat Sue Armstrong
Boy Scouts' Unscientific Discrimination
Usually it's kids who have been Scouts for a long time who get ejected.
While I think the research indicates that one's sexuality is determined
by the age of nine, overt depictions have to wait until children mature.
The issue of youth does factor into the issue, yeah. The question is,
When does one's sexual behavior indicate one's genetic predispositions?
Boys and girls experiment sexually with each other and, though such
experimentation might be between two individuals of the same
Genius: What is it? How does one buy it?
Not according to those who investigate cognitive human capabilities.
The better to retain one's mistaken preconceptions with.
I should post some extracts from Michael Shermer's coverage of what
constitutes genius. While the boundaries of genius are fuzzy, there
is still agreed-upon indications of _achievement._ Hell, I wonder if
the Skeptics Society web pages have the issue on line.
http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/index.htm
frice@linkline.com <DARWIN><