Messages Dated August 1997
1 - 20 of 7,304
Creation science
Respond to this, I'll look it up later. Pedit Ver 2.5
Abortion
is
So what was your point in the previous message before this one? Pedit Ver 2.5
Creation science
time
or
any
point
it
the
they
the
were
the
Abortion
Actually, that warning has nothing to do with the entire bible,
contrary to popular belief... If you pay attention, and realize that that
book was written long before the compilation of the bible, you would
realize that that warning applies only to the book it was written in Revelation. (Not that I believe in the validity OF Revelation, but, I
thought I would clear up a misconception. I have a BIG problem with
religion decided by committee, as modern-day
Plain 2 see
Justification please? You are appearing to contradict yourself
here...
Sue
ACLU News 01-30-97:
(look right) (look left) (look under nearest rock)
That's an answer??
Is that "nope" you couldn't divorce your wife and marry the cute
guy down the street if these laws were in effect, "nope" you personally
wouldn't, "nope" to it taking away your special rights, or some other
"nope" that I am failing to see due to the late hour?
Sue
Ken's Frontal Hole!!!
TopicX says "Smile, Jelly Motherfucker, as your ass is on CANDID CAMERA!"
EVADED
Then how would your spouse's sensibilities be a bit disturbed by
this supposed public display if (as I presume since your answer is
obscure again) it is exclusively behind the men's room door?
Sue
millennial foolishness [Was: Re: Waco on Fox Wednesday (fwd)]
you might want to tell Carol that not only are there two Ns in millennium
but that the next one begins not in 1000 days but in 1247 days on 1 Jan
2001.
QOFM.
Chris
Re: Mitsubishi's robot
i was waiting for the guy to get out of the suit.
QOFM.
Chris
opinions, opinions
that
<Groan> Have you considered that when it comes to the gods
of all other religions, you're an atheist? (Or, like the New
Testament, do you believe in them but just consider them demons?)
Is your disbelief (I presume here) in fairies and werewolves
"just another faith"?
Is it easier to have solutions spoonfed to you or to do
your thinking on your own?
Oh, there's power enough right now to end humanity, and
and probably anything over the insect
Abortion
Even a buck private knows the difference between deaths
and casualties.
plain 2 see
Dangerous as the Catholic church may be, the above are
currently Protestant phenomena--more specifically, part of the
"bible-believing" Protestants.
They, of course, contend that they are themselves "earnest"
in the beliefs. Certainly they are putting their beliefs into
action.
If you call them "not True Christians," they will return
the favor.
You've set up a couple of strawmen here--Catholic church
and "frighten children into doing their chores"--instead of
trying to come to terms with the issue.
Why do I suspect
Two Questions
Nope.. I am saying that one should take a chance so that her UNBORN BABY
could possibly live.
Both things occuring(mother and child dying) are not definitely going to
happen. MAybe they will die, maybe they won't, but one should take the
chance..
Let me know when it does, okay?
I never said that procreation by itself can be unhealthy. Generally, there
are other factors involved.
Oh, but I never said that heterosexuality could cause death of one of the
Two Questions
Hmm.. Murdered by her unborn baby? Does he have a knife or something down
there, by any chance? How would he manage to do that?
The unborn baby is not killing her, but is merely one factor is such a
scenario.
SInce there would be no procreation without heterosexual sex, obviously
I
could not say it is immoral.
Nice try.. I find it quite fascinating how you can twist anything into
what
you want it to be..
And I do
Lying Fuck Ken Young 1/
Touche. I have to admit, those are good points, and well worth thinking
about.
However, if genes did change, would every part of them change? I mean,
isn't
it POSSIBLE that those genes might only change a tiny bit, so that those
changes above might not occur?
Also, some people have changed their looks considerably. There have been
women, for instance, that without trying for that effect, started looking
more masculine. And it works the other way around, as well.
Mything Links.
Not all churches. I know that when I was in a basically racially mixed
area(central NJ), I generally went to churches that had people of all races
attend them.
Well, I can honestly say, I have never heard from my god or minister, "if
you
don't kiss my ass."
And who is advocating people to go against their nature?
You don't believe in God. I disagree with you. Don't you think I am wrong?
Only one thing will land you
KYBaby
If that was true, then I would not say that this is not part of the real
world, as I have been.
I do not consider myself that much a part of the cyberspace community.
A
little, but since I am not on the Internet yet, and only on a few echoes
on
Fido, plus a whole semi-local net I help out, I would not consider
pro-computer views to be part of that box.
Okay, would this fit in my
Ponder this, no?
By that time, I likely will be working for myself.
As I have said before, the woman I marry will agree with me on most of my
beliefs. There are more out there, than you might think.
Did it ever occur to you why I might believe some things that are considered
to be odd? Could it be, that I actually thought like the norm at one time,
but finally came to the conclusion, that most of my beliefs at
Something to ponder
Not sure Cunanin is one of the best examples to use, since we still don't
know
why he killed those people.
Hmm.. I have meaning to take a vacation.. And yes, the only ways I could be considered dangerous, is if one attacked
me
or those I cared about, or if you consider the fact that some believe what
I
say, to be a sign that I really am dangerous.
Heck, even the govts. believe in conspiracies. Just ask