Messages From Terry Smith
41 - 60 of 192

Jack's "moderation"
to `The point is' that *you* have made claims, refused to support them, then attempted to twist any debate into requests that people provide evidence for their failure to accept your claims, rather than address your apparent inability to provide reasons why they should do so. You're out of your depth, and floundering. Bullshit like that doesn't, and won't work in this forum. Terry

Spelling
No. There is a strong probability that if you start by calling your opponents `idiots', `morons' and words of that ilk, claim a `genius' intellect, and generally extoll your obvious brilliance and superior education as proof that your claims are inviolate, then an inability to write a simple english sentence may be produced as an indication that you might be incorrect. Terry

Jack's "moderation"
The topic is your claim that these messages broke the echo rules A claim made in the face of a clear admission from Jack that no rules were broken. No-one needs to `work' to disprove your claim. In order to have it accepted, you need to support it. Attempts to deflect your inability to do so in order to argue `as you can't disprove my claim, you must accept it' are failing, and will continue to fail. Your persistance

Jack's "moderation"
By posting in an echo, I am asking all. As one who feels competent to moderate, you should know that. Your name is in the header because you are the one who mentioned Charles. You, as per your usual behaviour over the past few years, have posted messages which undercut your argument, but give indications of the underlying pathology that gives rise to them. Terry

The Debate
Name them Or are you going to rely on your `as I remember' once again? Terry

Jack lies again
Not quite true... I apologise, but I'm about to do something that will cause either Charles's monitor or retinas to fail for a short period of time Clear evidence that Jack's `removing himself' was a response to undisputable advice that he was, according to the owner of the echo, aready `gone'.: Area SKEPTIC Date Mon Oct 27, 20:11 From Sheppard Gordon 1:379/12 To All Subj Jack Loses Meta_UFO 2 Date: 10-26-97 (06:13)

Jack's crappy moderation
Area SKEPTIC Date Wed Jul 30, 17:59 From Sheppard Gordon 1:2430/2112 To Fredric Rice Subj Jack's Censorship On 07-28-97, Fredric Rice wrote to David Bloomberg: You might like to see this post from David to Jack from earlier in the year which I saved, demonstrating Jack's feelings in favor of censorship in his echo (also note Jack's now age-old claim/lie that he won't post to me or David): From: David Bloomberg To: Jack P

Jack's "moderation"
I have been following this echo for some years now Jack. You have never stated which rule was broken, but have stated you threw him out becuase he annoyed you. Terry

NYTimes Mag Religion arti
Rod claimed there was more than one solution. When asked to provide one, he made a second claim That asking for evidence of a claim he had made is `innapropriate here'. A curious reaction from one whose moderation style [non-moderation] in the echos where he is the moderator is his one redeeming attribute. It's the most rattled I've seen him for a long time. If questions that Rod can't answer other than by abuse, waffling and diversion make a

Erratic, lying Jack
Reality check: Area SKEPTIC Date Sat Jan 03, 18:11 From Sheppard Gordon 1:278/230 To Rod Speed Subj Jack lies again On 01-02-98, Jack Sargeant wrote to Rod Speed: Terry

Spelling
Which one? Terry

Jack's crappy moderation
Shut up then. Terry

Jack's crappy moderation
Egad Nelson was an infamous net-kook in sci.skeptic for some years. You would have had a conference where the norm was the likes of Wollman, Kettler and Curley. Terry

Vampires attack only the ignorant
Ordinary people whose aim is to obtain and drink human blood. Terry

Fallen heros
Evidence? Terry

Spelling
He's probably got all the soldiers in the set. Terry

NYTimes Mag Religion arti
I'll take it as a compliment. Terry

Jack's crappy moderation
My address is either 3:800/846.23 or terrys@gastro.apana.org.au. There's a clue in both of those. The first is my fidonet point address, the other is the address of my personal Usenet<>Fidonet gateway, at present running OS/2 but eventually to be a Linux system. I roll my own. You called someone a liar. You were asked to produce evidence of the lie. Your response to people commenting that you haven't done so appears to be `If I could, I'd thump you.' Two

Shed some speed of light
The one's I want are those from the only time I *ever* saw Jackson Harding get angry. (The `vaccination is a con' fruit-loop) Terry

Shed some speed of light
Not once did he address the problem that the same equations that predict his `time dilation' also predict a somewhat exponential rise in the driven mass at any speed where the effects make any difference. The thread I found most amusing was: Area SKEPTIC Date Fri Oct 24, 21:33 From George Jiri Opletal 3:632/562 To Sheppard Gordon Subj Jack and George Well, I've seen it all now, Jack does not allow his personal conflict