Messages From Laurie Appleton
1 - 20 of 5,835
your answer
There is no problem in answering you, except that your name
has not come up in the pile of waiting messages. I try to
answer messages in the ORDER in which they are CAPTURED on my
system, and I have so many evolutionists who are desperately
seeking my answers that I am normally about three weeks behind!
Sorry, but I can only ask for patience or ask some other
informed Creationists to join in with their contributions.
The trouble is
AGE OF SUN.
is
Do you mean to say that they have NOW found the number
of neutrinos that their theory required, or have they just
altered their equations like they do with the Bib Bang?
Laurie
Re: your answer
No I meant WEEKS, but since I read messages as they are being
CAPTURED then, where it seems necessary, as in this case, to make
a brief ONLINE comment then I will do so.
Laurie
Creation? evolution.
The flood I meant was the one that caused the "billions of
dead things buried in rock layers, which were laid down by
water, all over the world." Good point! But never mind about religion, it is just as
important to get one's facts straight about scientific
matters as well isn't it?
How could he consider himself a skeptic if he has never
bothered to learn all the simplest things about the
weaknesses of evolution? e.g.
M.A.C.O.S.
That sounds as though you are a fervent advocate of
"balanced treatment" of subjects in Colleges doesn't it? Can
I ask then if you were disappointed when students were
DENIED this right in respect to Creation Science?
A dozen of so STATES in the United States had passed laws
requiring balanced treatment but these were challenged in
the courts, by the evolutionary establishment as being in
conflict with the Constitution. They succeeded in their
challenge and therefore students are indeed
Creation? evolution #2
Does that mean that you are really a subconscious
worshipper of the "all-powerful' God then?
It is true that most Christians place the LIMITATION of
only ONE God on God. Are you saying that you believe in MANY
gods? But then a leading atheist Nobel Prize winning
evolutionist says;
"[Natural] selection is the blindest, and most cruel way of
evolving new species, and more and more complex and refined
organisms The struggle for life and elimination
your answer
Still behind in replies, but this is another online quick one.
The answer is yes, of course. i.e.
1. Sudden appearance.
2. Stasis.
3. Catastrophism.
These were always consistent creationist arguments. However there
is much much more such as;
1. The origin of energy.
2. The origin of the Time
3. The origin of the Big Bang
4. The origin of space
5. The origin of physical and chemical laws
6. The origin of Stars, Galaxies, Clusters of Galaxies.
7.
Gould
Sorry, I don't have that book, BUT the word FREQUENT in the
above looks as if it should read INFREQUENT? Would you confirm
whether you have made a blunder there? It makes no sense as you
have written it?
Laurie
And now for something com
Hey, there is something screwy here. Aren't evolutionists
supposed to believe that it is almost certain that there is
advanced life in many other parts of the Universe? Don't some
leading evolutionists argue that life might have been deliberately
sent here by such alien advanced beings?
So why is an evolutionist so uptight about UFO's? Surely it is
basically an evolutionary scenario isn't it?
Laurie
Leap Trivia
Hey come on now Grant? How could an atheist/evolutionist use
the term "evil"? Is there really any such thing to an atheist?
Doesn't atheism mean that there are NO gods of any sort, let
alone lots of them?
Laurie
AGE OF SUN.
Are you saying that we know for sure that there are THREE types
of neutrinos, or is that just a speculation?
The following refers to a Soviet team. Could that be the
one you are thinking about?
Well twenty years after, and in spite of much effort,
nothing has come up yet has it? At least New Scientist of
August 18, 1990 says;
"A joint Soviet-US team has failed to find anywhere near
the required amount of subatomic particles called
Gould
Good news Ross. I have that book of Gould's as well as half
a dozen more by Gould. Gould comes closer to being a 'closet
creationist' than any other evolutionist I have come across. For
example he proposes THREE major principles that Creationists have
consistently advocated from BEFORE Darwin wrote his book on
Origins. i.e.
1. Sudden appearance.
2. Stasis
3. Catastrophism.
Of course he differs from Creationists in precise details, but
the amazing thing is that he is at
Re: your answer
The dinosaurs are no problem really. The real problem is
to fit in the Whales, sharks, dolphins, etc. which Australia's
premier geologist insists MUST HAVE been taken on board as well!
Don't know why he just does not settle for the corny argument
that a wooden boat would not be seaworthy enough, no matter
how few animals were really needed!
"Ernst Mayr, probably the leading American systematic
taxonomist, lists the following numbers for animal species
according to the best estimates
Leap Trivia
Can you present any scientific evidence to support your claim
of a 'supreme being'?
Laurie
Joseph Newman
Don't the laws of Thermodynamics show that perpetual motion
is impossible!? End of story.
"As far as we know, all changes are in the direction of
increasing entropy, of increasing disorder, of increasing
randomness, of running down."
(Isaac Asimov, "Can Decreasing Entropy Exist in the
Universe?" Science Digest, (May 1973), p. 76.)
With everything "running down" then sooner or later NO
motion will exist. Scientists call this state the 'Heat-death' of
the universe.
Laurie
Creationists on Trial.
Thank you for that information. I had not heard of it from
any sources outside Electronic Mail Systems. Fancy
evolutionists of all people trying to argue that Children
are being given "codswallop", when we remember Piltdown Man,
Nebraska Man, Neanderthal Man, Java Man, Ramapithecus,
Peking Man etc. etc. to say nothing of the wild fairy
stories that they have constantly made up about missing
links! Just look at the following as an example!
"The missing link between man and the
Catastrophism
Then perhaps you could tell me something NEW that you
learned? Was there really anything new to tell after all
these years, or are you like some religious types who never
cease to get a "thrill" about hearing the "Old Old Story"
all over again!
In other words the religious character of you "belief
system" is dreadfully obvious!
Then you do yourself no credit (as usual) since the
famous evolutionist, S.J. Gould has a very different opinion
of Velikovsky. i.e.
Catastrophism (b)
That is called, "not seeing the wood for the trees".
Where do you think that places like the Grand Canyon came
from? You don't honestly think that such a large series of
"sedimentary" layers was laid down on a Sunday School
picnic or during flooding due to an unusally wet
summer do you?
So how could all those Dinosaurs get trapped, buried and
preserved in the uppermost strata in the Grand Canyon, let
alone all the multiplied millions of other
Scientific Facts.
In accordance with your expressed wish that you be left
LESS messages, because you also have a "life" outside of
Electronic messages, I have been adding your messages to a
"HOLD" file for the time being. That will include this one
as well and any other in this batch or messages that I have
received will receive.
I will wait until you request that I begain again
responding!
Laurie
Who is a Moron?
If you had read the words of Jesus in the New Testament
then you would probably think that He was a Moron Himself,
since he obviously believed fully in Adam and Eve as well as
Noah and the Flood!
So it is all those people that do NOT believe in such
things and, in SPITE of that still pretend that they are
Christians, that would be the ones who are the MORONS and
who make all sorts of "twisted efforts"