Messages From Ken Peck
81 - 85 of 85

Time displacement
Mr. Rice. I have already cluttered this conference with -FOUR- responses to your question. Go pedal your crap elsewhere. Stop wasting everyone's time and the network's money. _@ Ken Peck _ \<._ (_)/ (_) Kenneth_Peck@clr.com

10%
Epidemological studies are the only kind of evidence? You've got to be kidding! What a strange world you must live in. _@ Ken Peck _ \<._ (_)/ (_) Kenneth_Peck@clr.com

[2/2] abortion
Could be. On the other hand, we generally do restrict others people's choices in many ways, such as you are not free to chose to murder. I'm sorry if you feel offended by laws against murder, rape, assault, theft and what not. _@ Ken Peck _ \<._ (_)/ (_) Kenneth_Peck@clr.com

[2/2] abortion
We are in agreement. My language was not fuzzy, but yours is. Doubtless the legal definition is precise because it is arbitrary. I seriously doubt that "2+2=4" is particularly arbitrary. On the other hand, the legal definition is not only arbitrary, it is subject to change. There have been numerous changes in the legal definition of 'person' over the past century and a half. Well, this is an interesting twist. Now I attempted to avoid language, such as 'person' which

[2/2] abortion
Well, you are the one who wants to discuss the notion of 'legal person' which, when it comes to human beings, is arbitrary, and includes impersonal entities such as corporations. And it is you who have entered into the fuzzy language of 'viability.' I have tried to stay within the realm of non-theological, scientific, rational, empirical, verifiable statements. But you seem to what to discuss theology, law, and popular opinion. What of course I meant to say and what I